Quadro FX 3000 vs RADEON X800 PRO

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 3000 vs RADEON X800 PRO FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 3000 vs RADEON X800 PRO: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 3000

2008

Why buy it

✅100.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 189W instead of 250W, a 61W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

RADEON X800 PRO

2020

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Quadro FX 3000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON X800 PRO is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 3000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌32.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 189W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 3000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 100.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 6.2% in PassMark G3D (69 vs 65), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON X800 PRO is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 55nm, 60 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2008. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON X800 PRO makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro FX 3000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro FX 3000 vs RADEON X800 PRO Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 3000

The Quadro FX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $3,499.

RADEON X800 PRO

The RADEON X800 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 65 points. Launch price was $579.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 3000 scores 69 versus the RADEON X800 PRO's 65 — the Quadro FX 3000 leads by 6.2%. The Quadro FX 3000 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the RADEON X800 PRO uses RDNA 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3000) vs 3,840 (RADEON X800 PRO). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3000) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 PRO).

Feature	Quadro FX 3000	RADEON X800 PRO
G3D Mark Score	69+6%	65
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	55 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	240	3840+1500%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	16.17 TFLOPS+2499%
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	80	240+200%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	4 MB+1500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 3000	RADEON X800 PRO
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3000 and 64-bit on the RADEON X800 PRO. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 3000) vs 4 MB (RADEON X800 PRO) — the RADEON X800 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 3000	RADEON X800 PRO
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	4 MB+1500%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3000 draws 189W versus the RADEON X800 PRO's 250W — a 27.8% difference. The Quadro FX 3000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3000) vs 350W (RADEON X800 PRO). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	Quadro FX 3000	RADEON X800 PRO
TDP	189W-24%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	1mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	0.4+33%	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 3000 came in at $0, while the RADEON X800 PRO launched at $399. On MSRP, Quadro FX 3000 was 100+% cheaper ($399 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro FX 3000) vs 0.2 (RADEON X800 PRO) — the Quadro FX 3000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X800 PRO (2020 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 3000	RADEON X800 PRO
MSRP	$0-100%	$399
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	0.2
Codename	GT200B	Navi 21
Release	November 11 2008	October 28 2020
Ranking	#815	#65

Search Quadro FX 3000 on Amazon

Search RADEON X800 PRO on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.