
RADEON X800 PRO vs RADEON X800 XL

RADEON X800 PRO
Popular choices:

RADEON X800 XL
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON X800 PRO is positioned at rank 371 and the RADEON X800 XL is on rank 368, so the RADEON X800 XL offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X800 PRO
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X800 XL
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X800 XL is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON X800 PRO.
| Insight | RADEON X800 PRO | RADEON X800 XL |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.2%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON X800 XL offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $15 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 6.2% better value per dollar than the RADEON X800 PRO.
| Insight | RADEON X800 PRO | RADEON X800 XL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+6.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X800 PRO and RADEON X800 XL

RADEON X800 PRO
The RADEON X800 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 65 points. Launch price was $579.

RADEON X800 XL
The RADEON X800 XL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON X800 PRO scores 65 versus the RADEON X800 XL's 69 — the RADEON X800 XL leads by 6.2%. The RADEON X800 PRO is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RADEON X800 XL uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 3,840 (RADEON X800 PRO) vs 4,608 (RADEON X800 XL). Raw compute: 16.17 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 PRO) vs 20.74 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 XL). Boost clocks: 2105 MHz vs 2250 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (RADEON X800 PRO) vs 72 (RADEON X800 XL).
| Feature | RADEON X800 PRO | RADEON X800 XL |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 65 | 69+6% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 | 4608+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.17 TFLOPS | 20.74 TFLOPS+28% |
| Boost Clock | 2105 MHz | 2250 MHz+7% |
| ROPs | 96 | 128+33% |
| TMUs | 240 | 288+20% |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 | 72+20% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X800 PRO | RADEON X800 XL |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | RADEON X800 PRO | RADEON X800 XL |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X800 PRO draws 250W versus the RADEON X800 XL's 300W — a 18.2% difference. The RADEON X800 PRO is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X800 PRO) vs 350W (RADEON X800 XL). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON X800 PRO | RADEON X800 XL |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-17% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3+50% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X800 PRO launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the RADEON X800 XL launched at $349 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.3 (RADEON X800 PRO) vs 4.6 (RADEON X800 XL) — the RADEON X800 XL offers 7% better value.
| Feature | RADEON X800 PRO | RADEON X800 XL |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $349-13% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.3 | 4.6+7% |
| Codename | Navi 21 | Navi 21 |
| Release | October 28 2020 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #65 | #42 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















