
GeForce MX570
Popular choices:

Radeon 760M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce MX570
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon 760M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 15W.
Radeon 760M
2024Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 25W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 38.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
GeForce MX570
2022Radeon 760M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 25W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon 760M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 38.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce MX570 better than Radeon 760M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 760M make more sense than GeForce MX570?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce MX570 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 7 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 4 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce MX570 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 11 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce MX570 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 53 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce MX570 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 35 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 and Radeon 760M

GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570
The GeForce MX570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,738 points.

Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M
The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce MX570 scores 5,738 versus the Radeon 760M's 5,449 — the GeForce MX570 leads by 5.3%. The GeForce MX570 is built on Ampere while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570) vs 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 2599 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce MX570) vs 8 (Radeon 760M) with 64 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,738+5% | 5,449 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+300% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS | 5.323 TFLOPS+13% |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 2599 MHz+125% |
| ROPs | 40+150% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+1438% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16+100% | 8 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX570 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 760M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX570 draws 25W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 50% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: Mobile vs None.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W | 15W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | None |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 229.5 | 363.3+58% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 760M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | — |
| Codename | GA107 | Phoenix |
| Release | Maio 2022 | January 31 2024 |
| Ranking | #407 | #421 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













