
RadeonT RX 6850M XT vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

RadeonT RX 6850M XT
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RadeonT RX 6850M XT
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RadeonT RX 6850M XT uses modern memory architecture. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RadeonT RX 6850M XT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.9%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $99 versus $600 for the RadeonT RX 6850M XT, it costs 84% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 535.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+535.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($600) | ✅More affordable ($99) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RadeonT RX 6850M XT and GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

RadeonT RX 6850M XT
The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,992 points.

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 2 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 2432 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,673 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The RadeonT RX 6850M XT scores 13,992 and the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti reaches 14,673 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti uses Pascal, both on 7 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs 2,432 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti). Raw compute: 13.21 TFLOPS (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs 8.186 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti). Boost clocks: 2581 MHz vs 1683 MHz.
| Feature | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,992 | 14,673+5% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+5% | 2432 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.21 TFLOPS+61% | 8.186 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2581 MHz+53% | 1683 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+5% | 152 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 912 KB+78% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RadeonT RX 6850M XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RadeonT RX 6850M XT comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti has 8 GB. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) — the RadeonT RX 6850M XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti).
| Feature | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | NVDEC 3rd Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RadeonT RX 6850M XT draws 165W versus the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti's 180W — a 8.7% difference. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.
| Feature | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W-8% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 84.8+4% | 81.5 |
Value Analysis
The RadeonT RX 6850M XT launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $600, while the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $99. The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti costs 83.5% less ($501 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.3 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs 148.2 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti offers 536.1% better value. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).
| Feature | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $399-60% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $600 | $99-84% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.3 | 148.2+536% |
| Codename | Navi 22 | GP104 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | November 2 2017 |
| Ranking | #103 | #161 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















