RadeonT RX 6850M XT vs Arc B570
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
Popular choices:
Arc B570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RadeonT RX 6850M XT
Performance Per Dollar Arc B570
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc B570 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RadeonT RX 6850M XT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Xe2 (2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (249mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Arc B570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $219 versus $600 for the RadeonT RX 6850M XT, it costs 64% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 175.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+175.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($600) | ✅More affordable ($219) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RadeonT RX 6850M XT and Arc B570
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,992 points.
Arc B570
The Arc B570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 16 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,060 points. Launch price was $219.
Graphics Performance
The RadeonT RX 6850M XT scores 13,992 and the Arc B570 reaches 14,060 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Arc B570 uses Xe2, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs 2,304 (Arc B570). Raw compute: 13.21 TFLOPS (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs 11.52 TFLOPS (Arc B570). Boost clocks: 2581 MHz vs 2500 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs 18 (Arc B570) vs 144.
| Feature | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,992 | 14,060 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+11% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.21 TFLOPS+15% | 11.52 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2581 MHz+3% | 2500 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 160+11% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4.5 MB+800% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 18 MB+500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40+122% | 18 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RadeonT RX 6850M XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc B570 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RadeonT RX 6850M XT comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Arc B570 has 8 GB. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs 18 MB (Arc B570) — the Arc B570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 160-bit+25% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 18 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc B570). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs Intel Xe Media (Arc B570). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs Intel Xe Media. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc B570).
| Feature | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | Intel Xe Media |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | Intel Xe Media |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RadeonT RX 6850M XT draws 165W versus the Arc B570's 150W — a 9.5% difference. The Arc B570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs 600W (Arc B570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 249mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W | 150W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 249mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 84.8 | 93.7+10% |
Value Analysis
The RadeonT RX 6850M XT launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $600, while the Arc B570 launched at $219 and now averages $219. The Arc B570 costs 63.5% less ($381 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.3 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs 64.2 (Arc B570) — the Arc B570 offers 175.5% better value. The Arc B570 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $219-78% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $600 | $219-64% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.3 | 64.2+176% |
| Codename | Navi 22 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | January 16 2025 |
| Ranking | #103 | #169 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RadeonT RX 6850M XT and Arc B570
