
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RadeonT RX 6850M XT
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.4% higher G3D Mark score and 433.3% more VRAM (64 GB vs 12 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RadeonT RX 6850M XT.
| Insight | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | Radeon Pro W6800X Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.4%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (64 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The RadeonT RX 6850M XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $600 versus $4,999 for the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo, it costs 88% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 690.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | Radeon Pro W6800X Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+690.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($600) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($4,999) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RadeonT RX 6850M XT and Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

RadeonT RX 6850M XT
The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,992 points.

Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
The Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,742 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RadeonT RX 6850M XT scores 13,992 versus the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo's 14,742 — the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo leads by 5.4%. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs 3,840 (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo). Raw compute: 13.21 TFLOPS (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo). Boost clocks: 2581 MHz vs 1967 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs 60 ×2 (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo).
| Feature | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | Radeon Pro W6800X Duo |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,992 | 14,742+5% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3840 ×2+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.21 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS ×2+14% |
| Boost Clock | 2581 MHz+31% | 1967 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96 ×2+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 240 ×2+50% |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 60 ×2+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RadeonT RX 6850M XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro W6800X Duo lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | Radeon Pro W6800X Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RadeonT RX 6850M XT comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo has 64 GB. The Radeon Pro W6800X Duo offers 433.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo) — the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | Radeon Pro W6800X Duo |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 64 GB+433% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 8.
| Feature | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | Radeon Pro W6800X Duo |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 8+700% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs VCN 3.0 (2x) (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs VCN 3.0 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo).
| Feature | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | Radeon Pro W6800X Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 3.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 3.0 (2x) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RadeonT RX 6850M XT draws 165W versus the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo's 400W — a 83.2% difference. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs 500W (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | Radeon Pro W6800X Duo |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W-59% | 400W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 84.8+130% | 36.9 |
Value Analysis
The RadeonT RX 6850M XT launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $600, while the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo launched at $4999 and now averages $4999. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT costs 88% less ($4399 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.3 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs 2.9 (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo) — the RadeonT RX 6850M XT offers 703.4% better value. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | Radeon Pro W6800X Duo |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000-80% | $4999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $600-88% | $4999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.3+703% | 2.9 |
| Codename | Navi 22 | Navi 21 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #103 | #157 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













