RadeonT RX 6850M XT vs GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RadeonT RX 6850M XT
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 11.6% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB.
| Insight | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+11.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-11.6%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $209 versus $600 for the RadeonT RX 6850M XT, it costs 65% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 157.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+157.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($600) | ✅More affordable ($209) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RadeonT RX 6850M XT and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,992 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RadeonT RX 6850M XT scores 13,992 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 12,535 — the RadeonT RX 6850M XT leads by 11.6%. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Raw compute: 13.21 TFLOPS (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Boost clocks: 2581 MHz vs 1777 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 80.
| Feature | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,992+12% | 12,535 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.21 TFLOPS+45% | 9.098 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2581 MHz+45% | 1777 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+100% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2.5 MB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40+100% | 20 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RadeonT RX 6850M XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RadeonT RX 6850M XT comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has 8 GB. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the RadeonT RX 6850M XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB).
| Feature | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RadeonT RX 6850M XT draws 165W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 130W — a 23.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 66°C.
| Feature | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W | 130W-21% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 242mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 66°C-22% |
| Perf/Watt | 84.8 | 96.4+14% |
Value Analysis
The RadeonT RX 6850M XT launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $600, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 and now averages $209. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB costs 65.2% less ($391 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.3 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) vs 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 157.5% better value.
| Feature | RadeonT RX 6850M XT | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $249-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $600 | $209-65% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.3 | 60.0+158% |
| Codename | Navi 22 | GA106 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #103 | #211 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RadeonT RX 6850M XT and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
