RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1650
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 89.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.
| Insight | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+89.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-89.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile and GeForce GTX 1650
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1635 MHz to 2115 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,909 points.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile scores 14,909 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile leads by 89.5%. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 12.99 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2115 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,909+89% | 7,869 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+243% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.99 TFLOPS+335% | 2.984 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2115 MHz+27% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+71% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+241% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+1100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTX 1650 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 100% advantage for the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s+100% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+1100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ada) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: NVDEC (Ada) vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ada) | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ada) | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 40% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 70°C.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-33% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 300W-40% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 298.2+184% | 104.9 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $75 |
| Codename | AD107 | TU117 |
| Release | March 21 2023 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #155 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile and GeForce GTX 1650
