
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon Pro W5700

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro W5700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro W5700.
| Insight | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile and Radeon Pro W5700

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1635 MHz to 2115 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,909 points.

Radeon Pro W5700
The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile scores 14,909 and the Radeon Pro W5700 reaches 14,380 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro W5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700). Raw compute: 12.99 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700). Boost clocks: 2115 MHz vs 1930 MHz.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,909+4% | 14,380 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+33% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.99 TFLOPS+46% | 8.893 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2115 MHz+10% | 1930 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 96 | 144+50% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+200% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+200% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ada) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Decoder: NVDEC (Ada) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700).
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ada) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ada) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile draws 50W versus the Radeon Pro W5700's 205W — a 121.6% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 500W (Radeon Pro W5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85°C.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-76% | 205W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 298.2+325% | 70.1 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $300 |
| Codename | AD107 | Navi 10 |
| Release | March 21 2023 | November 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #155 | #163 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











