RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs TITAN RTX

NVIDIA

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

2023Core: 720 MHzBoost: 1560 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

TITAN RTX

2018Core: 1350 MHzBoost: 1770 MHz
Similar parts
·······

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs TITAN RTX Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs TITAN RTX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs TITAN RTX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

2023

Why buy it

  • Costs $500 less on MSRP ($1,999 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 28.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.3 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 70W instead of 280W, a 210W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than TITAN RTX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

TITAN RTX

2018

Why buy it

  • 76.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 200% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 192).
  • 1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • Older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 25% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,499 MSRPvs$1,999 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 10.3 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • 300% higher power demand at 280W vs 70W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
TITAN RTX is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 76.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation instead at 20,669 vs 20,095, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while TITAN RTX is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 12nm, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2018. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation makes the most sense to buy today. It is $500 cheaper on MSRP at $1,999 vs $2,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 28.6% (10.3 vs 8.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. TITAN RTX still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs TITAN RTX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 720 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,669 points.

NVIDIA

TITAN RTX

The TITAN RTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 18 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 280W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,095 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Graphics Performance

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation scores 20,669 and the TITAN RTX reaches 20,095 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the TITAN RTX uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 4,608 (TITAN RTX). Raw compute: 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (TITAN RTX). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 72 (TITAN RTX) with 192 Tensor cores vs 576.

FeatureRTX 4000 SFF Ada GenerationTITAN RTX
G3D Mark Score
20,669+3%
20,095
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Turing
Process Node
5 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
6144+33%
4608
Compute (TFLOPS)
19.17 TFLOPS+18%
16.31 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1770 MHz+13%
ROPs
64
96+50%
TMUs
192
288+50%
L1 Cache
6 MB+33%
4.5 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB+700%
6 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
48
72+50%
Tensor Cores
192
576+200%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The TITAN RTX does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The TITAN RTX supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

FeatureRTX 4000 SFF Ada GenerationTITAN RTX
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has 2 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN RTX carries 24 GB. TITAN RTX gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 280 GB/s (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 672 GB/s (TITAN RTX) — a 140% advantage for the TITAN RTX. Memory bus width is 160-bit on the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 384-bit on the TITAN RTX. L2 Cache: 48 MB (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 6 MB (TITAN RTX) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRTX 4000 SFF Ada GenerationTITAN RTX
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
24 GB+1100%
Memory Type
GDDR6 ECC
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
280 GB/s
672 GB/s+140%
Bus Width
160-bit
384-bit+140%
L2 Cache
48 MB+700%
6 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 12 Ultimate (TITAN RTX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRTX 4000 SFF Ada GenerationTITAN RTX
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (TITAN RTX). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (TITAN RTX).

FeatureRTX 4000 SFF Ada GenerationTITAN RTX
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC (2x)
NVENC (7th Gen)
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
NVDEC (4th Gen)
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation draws 70W versus the TITAN RTX's 280W — a 120% difference. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 650W (TITAN RTX). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.

FeatureRTX 4000 SFF Ada GenerationTITAN RTX
TDP
70W-75%
280W
Recommended PSU
750W
650W-13%
Power Connector
1x 8-pin
2x 8-pin
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
111mm
116mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
80
Perf/Watt
295.3+311%
71.8
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation came in at $1999, while the TITAN RTX launched at $2499. On MSRP, RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation was 20% cheaper ($500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.3 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 8.0 (TITAN RTX) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation offers 28.8% better value. The newer card here is RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation (2023 vs 2018).

FeatureRTX 4000 SFF Ada GenerationTITAN RTX
MSRP
$1999-20%
$2499
Performance per Dollar
10.3+29%
8.0
Codename
AD104
TU102
Release
March 21 2023
December 18 2018
Ranking
#71
#91

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.