
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

TITAN V
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs TITAN V Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs TITAN V FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs TITAN V: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,000 less on MSRP ($1,999 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 54.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.3 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than TITAN V across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
TITAN V
2017Why buy it
- ✅32.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2017 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌50% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$1,999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 10.3 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs TITAN V Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 720 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,669 points.

TITAN V
The TITAN V is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2017. It features the Volta architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,077 points. Launch price was $2,999.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation scores 20,669 and the TITAN V reaches 20,077 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the TITAN V uses Volta, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 5,120 (TITAN V). Raw compute: 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 14.9 TFLOPS (TITAN V). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 1455 MHz.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,669+3% | 20,077 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Volta |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+20% | 5120 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.17 TFLOPS+29% | 14.9 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz+7% | 1455 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 192 | 320+67% |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB | 7.5 MB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+967% | 4.5 MB |
| Tensor Cores | 192 | 640+233% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The TITAN V does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The TITAN V leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has 2 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN V carries 12 GB. TITAN V gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 280 GB/s (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 653 GB/s (TITAN V) — a 133.2% advantage for the TITAN V. Memory bus width is 160-bit on the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 3072-bit on the TITAN V. L2 Cache: 48 MB (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 4.5 MB (TITAN V) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 12 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 ECC | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 280 GB/s | 653 GB/s+133% |
| Bus Width | 160-bit | 3072-bit+1820% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+967% | 4.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 12.1 (TITAN V). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs NVENC 6.0 (TITAN V). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (TITAN V).
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation draws 70W versus the TITAN V's 250W — a 112.5% difference. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 600W (TITAN V). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-72% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 600W-20% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 295.3+268% | 80.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation came in at $1999, while the TITAN V launched at $2999. On MSRP, RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation was 33.3% cheaper ($1000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.3 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 6.7 (TITAN V) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation offers 53.7% better value. The newer card here is RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999-33% | $2999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.3+54% | 6.7 |
| Codename | AD104 | GV100 |
| Release | March 21 2023 | December 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #71 | #109 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














