RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 11.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-11.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+11.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU scores 20,312 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 11.5%. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 2550 MHz vs 2535 MHz. Ray tracing: 100 RT cores (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 34 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) with 400 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312 | 22,651+12% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 12800+194% | 4352 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 65.28 TFLOPS+196% | 22.06 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2550 MHz | 2535 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+267% | 48 |
| TMUs | 400+194% | 136 |
| L1 Cache | 12.5 MB+191% | 4.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+125% | 32 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 100+194% | 34 |
| Tensor Cores | 400+194% | 136 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — a 100% advantage for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s+100% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+125% | 32 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU draws 175W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W | 160W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 550W-15% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 116.1 | 141.6+22% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
