RTX A2000 Embedded GPU vs GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU.
| Insight | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A2000 Embedded GPU and GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 607 MHz to 1177 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,117 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1343 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 14 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,269 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU scores 11,117 and the GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile reaches 11,269 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs 1,792 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile). Raw compute: 6.026 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs 4.813 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile). Boost clocks: 1177 MHz vs 1343 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs 14 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) with 80 Tensor cores vs 56.
| Feature | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,117 | 11,269+1% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+43% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.026 TFLOPS+25% | 4.813 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1177 MHz | 1343 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80+43% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+39% | 1.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20+43% | 14 |
| Tensor Cores | 80+43% | 56 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile).
| Feature | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU draws 35W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile's 45W — a 25% difference. The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 82mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-22% | 45W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 82mm | 0mm |
| Height | 4mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 317.6+27% | 250.4 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A2000 Embedded GPU and GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
