RTX A2000 Embedded GPU vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

#9

Intel Arc Pro B50

MSRP: $349|Avg: $349

110%

#11

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

MSRP: $900|Avg: $300

105%

#13

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#16

Radeon PRO W7500

MSRP: $429|Avg: $401

98%

#18

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $340

97%

#19

RTX A2000 12GB

MSRP: $449|Avg: $380

96%

#20

Radeon Pro Vega 56

MSRP: $399|Avg: $60

96%

#21

RTX A2000

MSRP: $450|Avg: $320

94%

#23

Intel Arc Pro B60

MSRP: $500|Avg: $450

87%

#24

Radeon PRO W7600

MSRP: $599|Avg: $599

86%

#25

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $625|Avg: $750

86%

#26

Radeon Pro Vega 48

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

79%

#27

Radeon Pro 5700 XT

MSRP: $500|Avg: $280

78%

#28

Quadro P5200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $240

73%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 41.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+41.3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-41.3%)
Longevity	🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

League of Legends

No prediction data available

Valorant

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RTX A2000 Embedded GPU and GeForce GTX 1650

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 607 MHz to 1177 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,117 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU scores 11,117 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU leads by 41.3%. The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is built on Ampere while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 6.026 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1177 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	11,117+41%	7,869
Architecture	Ampere	Turing
Process Node	8 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	2560+186%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.026 TFLOPS+102%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1177 MHz	1665 MHz+41%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80+43%	56
L1 Cache	2.5 MB+184%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12.2+2%	12
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU draws 35W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 72.7% difference. The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 82mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.

Feature	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	35W-53%	75W
Recommended PSU	500W	300W-40%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	82mm	229mm
Height	4mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	70°C-7%
Perf/Watt	317.6+203%	104.9