RTX A2000 Embedded GPU vs Quadro RTX 3000
RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Quadro RTX 3000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 3000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro RTX 3000.
| Insight | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A2000 Embedded GPU and Quadro RTX 3000
RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 607 MHz to 1177 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,117 points.
Quadro RTX 3000
The Quadro RTX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,858 points. Launch price was $9,999.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU scores 11,117 and the Quadro RTX 3000 reaches 10,858 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is built on Ampere while the Quadro RTX 3000 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs 4,608 (Quadro RTX 3000). Raw compute: 6.026 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000). Boost clocks: 1177 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs 72 (Quadro RTX 3000) with 80 Tensor cores vs 576.
| Feature | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,117+2% | 10,858 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4608+80% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.026 TFLOPS | 16.31 TFLOPS+171% |
| Boost Clock | 1177 MHz | 1770 MHz+50% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 80 | 288+260% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 4.5 MB+80% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 72+260% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 576+620% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 3000 has 6 GB. The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX 3000) — the Quadro RTX 3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs 12.1 (Quadro RTX 3000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+40% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 3000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 3000).
| Feature | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU draws 35W versus the Quadro RTX 3000's 260W — a 152.5% difference. The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 3000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 82mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-87% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 82mm | 0mm |
| Height | 4mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 317.6+660% | 41.8 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).
| Feature | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $800 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $891 |
| Codename | GA107S | TU102 |
| Release | March 30 2022 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #243 | #78 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A2000 Embedded GPU and Quadro RTX 3000
