RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
VS
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU vs GeForce RTX 3050 8GB

NVIDIA

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

2022Core: 607 MHzBoost: 1177 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 8GB

2022Core: 1552 MHzBoost: 1777 MHz

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

#9
Intel Arc Pro B50
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
110%
#11
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
MSRP: $900|Avg: $300
105%
#13
RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#16
Radeon PRO W7500
MSRP: $429|Avg: $401
98%
#18
Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $340
97%
#19
RTX A2000 12GB
MSRP: $449|Avg: $380
96%
#20
Radeon Pro Vega 56
MSRP: $399|Avg: $60
96%
#21
RTX A2000
MSRP: $450|Avg: $320
94%
#23
Intel Arc Pro B60
MSRP: $500|Avg: $450
87%
#24
Radeon PRO W7600
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
86%
#25
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $625|Avg: $750
86%
#26
Radeon Pro Vega 48
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
79%
#27
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
MSRP: $500|Avg: $280
78%
#28
Quadro P5200
MSRP: $500|Avg: $240
73%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB

#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
112%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
111%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
111%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
109%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
109%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
107%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
107%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
107%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
106%
#17
Radeon RX 6700
MSRP: $379|Avg: $300
105%
#18
Radeon RX 6600 XT
MSRP: $379|Avg: $170
103%
#19
Radeon RX590 GME
MSRP: $173|Avg: $115
103%
#20
Radeon RX 6650 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $230
102%
#21
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
101%
#22
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP: $169|Avg: $179
100%
#23
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
MSRP: $249|Avg: $209
100%
#24
Radeon RX 6600 LE
MSRP: $329|Avg: $160
100%
#25
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
99%
#26
Radeon RX 7700 XT
MSRP: $449|Avg: $380
99%
#27
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $380
99%
#28
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
MSRP: $269|Avg: $318
98%
#29
Radeon RX 6700 XT
MSRP: $479|Avg: $230
98%
#30
GeForce RTX 3060
MSRP: $329|Avg: $289
98%
#31
Radeon RX 7400
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
98%
#32
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
97%
#33
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
96%
#34
Radeon RX 5300
MSRP: $129|Avg: $50
94%
#35
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
MSRP: $150|Avg: $77
93%
#36
Radeon RX 6400
MSRP: $159|Avg: $139
93%
#37
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
MSRP: $599|Avg: $330
93%
#38
Arc A750
MSRP: $289|Avg: $229
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 12.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU.

InsightRTX A2000 Embedded GPUGeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-12.8%)
Leading raw performance (+12.8%)
Longevity
🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
Ecosystem
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RTX A2000 Embedded GPU and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB

NVIDIA

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 607 MHz to 1177 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,117 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 8GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU scores 11,117 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 12,535 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 12.8%. The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Raw compute: 6.026 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Boost clocks: 1177 MHz vs 1777 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) with 80 Tensor cores vs 80.

FeatureRTX A2000 Embedded GPUGeForce RTX 3050 8GB
G3D Mark Score
11,117
12,535+13%
Architecture
Ampere
Ampere
Process Node
8 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
2560
2560
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.026 TFLOPS
9.098 TFLOPS+51%
Boost Clock
1177 MHz
1777 MHz+51%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
80
L1 Cache
2.5 MB
2.5 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
20
20
Tensor Cores
80
80

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRTX A2000 Embedded GPUGeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureRTX A2000 Embedded GPUGeForce RTX 3050 8GB
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRTX A2000 Embedded GPUGeForce RTX 3050 8GB
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB).

FeatureRTX A2000 Embedded GPUGeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Encoder
7th Gen NVENC
NVENC 7th gen
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
NVDEC 5th gen
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU draws 35W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 130W — a 115.2% difference. The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 82mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 66°C.

FeatureRTX A2000 Embedded GPUGeForce RTX 3050 8GB
TDP
35W-73%
130W
Recommended PSU
500W
450W-10%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
82mm
242mm
Height
4mm
112mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
66°C-12%
Perf/Watt
317.6+229%
96.4