RTX A2000 Embedded GPU vs Radeon Pro Vega 48
RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro Vega 48
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Vega 48
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | Standard Buffer (0 MB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro Vega 48 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A2000 Embedded GPU and Radeon Pro Vega 48
RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 607 MHz to 1177 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,117 points.
Radeon Pro Vega 48
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,270 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU scores 11,117 and the Radeon Pro Vega 48 reaches 11,270 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 uses GCN 5.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs 3,072 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Raw compute: 6.026 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Boost clocks: 1177 MHz vs 1300 MHz.
| Feature | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,117 | 11,270+1% |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3072+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.026 TFLOPS | 7.987 TFLOPS+33% |
| Boost Clock | 1177 MHz | 1300 MHz+10% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 192+140% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+233% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 has 0 MB. The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 48) — the Radeon Pro Vega 48 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 48).
| Feature | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU draws 35W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 48's 30W — a 15.4% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 82mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W | 30W-14% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 82mm | 0mm |
| Height | 4mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 317.6 | 375.7+18% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $450 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $450 |
| Codename | GA107S | Vega 10 |
| Release | March 30 2022 | March 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #243 | #241 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A2000 Embedded GPU and Radeon Pro Vega 48
