G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RTX A2000 vs RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

RTX A2000 vs RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RTX A2000

2021

Why buy it

✅10.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅85.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (104 vs 56).

Trade-offs

❌RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌100% higher power demand at 70W vs 35W.

RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile

2025

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 70W, a 35W reduction.
✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX A2000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (56 vs 104), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 29.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $450 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RTX A2000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 10.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.9% in PassMark G3D (13,464 vs 13,209), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 8nm and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2021. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RTX A2000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and lighter 1440p, RTX A2000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile has the stronger long-term case.

RTX A2000 vs RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RTX A2000

The RTX A2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 10 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,464 points. Launch price was $449.

RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile

The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 14 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,209 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The RTX A2000 scores 13,464 and the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile reaches 13,209 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A2000 is built on Ampere while the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,328 (RTX A2000) vs 1,792 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Raw compute: 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000) vs 9.032 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 26 RT cores (RTX A2000) vs 14 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) with 104 Tensor cores vs 56.

Feature	RTX A2000	RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
G3D Mark Score	13,464+2%	13,209
Architecture	Ampere	Blackwell 2.0
Process Node	8 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	3328+86%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	7.987 TFLOPS	9.032 TFLOPS+13%
Boost Clock	1200 MHz	2520 MHz+110%
ROPs	48+100%	24
TMUs	104+86%	56
L1 Cache	3.3 MB+83%	1.8 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB	24 MB+700%
Ray Tracing Cores	26+86%	14
Tensor Cores	104+86%	56

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RTX A2000	RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the RTX A2000 and 256-bit on the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile. L2 Cache: 3 MB (RTX A2000) vs 24 MB (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) — the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RTX A2000	RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	3 MB	24 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A2000) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 1.

Feature	RTX A2000	RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
DirectX	12.2+2%	12.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	6+500%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile).

Feature	RTX A2000	RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	9th Gen NVENC
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	6th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RTX A2000 draws 70W versus the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile's 35W — a 66.7% difference. The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A2000) vs 500W (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 167mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	RTX A2000	RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
TDP	70W	35W-50%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	167mm	0mm
Height	68mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	192.3	377.4+96%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile (2025 vs 2021).

Feature	RTX A2000	RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
MSRP	$450	—
Codename	GA106	GB207
Release	August 10 2021	March 19 2025
Ranking	#186	#244

Search RTX A2000 on Amazon

Search RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.