G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro GP100 vs RTX A2000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro GP100 vs RTX A2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro GP100

2016

Why buy it

✅32.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 16 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
1455.6% HIGHER MSRP
$7,000 MSRPvs$450 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 29.9 G3D/$ ($7,000 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
❌235.7% higher power demand at 235W vs 70W.
❌59.9% longer card at 267mm vs 167mm.

RTX A2000

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $6,550 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1427.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.9 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 70W instead of 235W, a 165W reduction.
✅Measures 167mm instead of 267mm, a 100mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro GP100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro GP100 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 32.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (13,710 vs 13,464), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX A2000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 16nm, 26 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RTX A2000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $6,550 cheaper on MSRP at $450 vs $7,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1427.6% (29.9 vs 2.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro GP100 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro GP100 vs RTX A2000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro GP100

The Quadro GP100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1304 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,710 points.

RTX A2000

The RTX A2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 10 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,464 points. Launch price was $449.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro GP100 scores 13,710 and the RTX A2000 reaches 13,464 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro GP100 is built on Pascal while the RTX A2000 uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Quadro GP100) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000). Raw compute: 10.34 TFLOPS (Quadro GP100) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000). Boost clocks: 1442 MHz vs 1200 MHz.

Feature	Quadro GP100	RTX A2000
G3D Mark Score	13,710+2%	13,464
Architecture	Pascal	Ampere
Process Node	16 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	3584+8%	3328
Compute (TFLOPS)	10.34 TFLOPS+29%	7.987 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1442 MHz+20%	1200 MHz
ROPs	96+100%	48
TMUs	224+115%	104
L1 Cache	1.3 MB	3.3 MB+154%
L2 Cache	4 MB+33%	3 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A2000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro GP100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Quadro GP100	RTX A2000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro GP100 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A2000 carries 8 GB. Quadro GP100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 4096-bit on the Quadro GP100 and 128-bit on the RTX A2000. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro GP100) vs 3 MB (RTX A2000) — the Quadro GP100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro GP100	RTX A2000
VRAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
Memory Type	HBM2	GDDR6
Bus Width	4096-bit+3100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+33%	3 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Quadro GP100) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	Quadro GP100	RTX A2000
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th gen (Quadro GP100) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Quadro GP100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000).

Feature	Quadro GP100	RTX A2000
Encoder	NVENC 4th gen	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC 3rd gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro GP100 draws 235W versus the RTX A2000's 70W — a 108.2% difference. The RTX A2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro GP100) vs 500W (RTX A2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Quadro GP100	RTX A2000
TDP	235W	70W-70%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	167mm
Height	111mm	68mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	75°C-6%
Perf/Watt	58.3	192.3+230%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro GP100 came in at $7000, while the RTX A2000 launched at $450. On MSRP, RTX A2000 was 93.6% cheaper ($6550 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (Quadro GP100) vs 29.9 (RTX A2000) — the RTX A2000 offers 1395% better value. The newer card here is RTX A2000 (2021 vs 2016).

Feature	Quadro GP100	RTX A2000
MSRP	$7000	$450-94%
Performance per Dollar	2.0	29.9+1395%
Codename	GP100	GA106
Release	October 1 2016	August 10 2021
Ranking	#178	#186

Search Quadro GP100 on Amazon

Search RTX A2000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.