
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell vs Quadro RTX 4000

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 4000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is significantly newer (2025 vs 2018). The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro RTX 4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro RTX 4000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $220 versus $748 for the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell, it costs 71% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 253.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+253.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($748) | ✅More affordable ($220) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell and Quadro RTX 4000

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 982 MHz to 1957 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,363 points.

Quadro RTX 4000
The Quadro RTX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1005 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,925 points. Launch price was $899.
Graphics Performance
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell scores 14,363 and the Quadro RTX 4000 reaches 14,925 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Quadro RTX 4000 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs 2,304 (Quadro RTX 4000). Raw compute: 17.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs 7.119 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000). Boost clocks: 1957 MHz vs 1545 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs 36 (Quadro RTX 4000) with 136 Tensor cores vs 288.
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,363 | 14,925+4% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+89% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.03 TFLOPS+139% | 7.119 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1957 MHz+27% | 1545 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 136 | 144+6% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+87% | 2.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 36+6% |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 288+112% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 4000 has 8 GB. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000) — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 4000). Decoder: 6th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000).
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 9th Gen NVENC | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | 6th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP10 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell draws 70W versus the Quadro RTX 4000's 160W — a 78.3% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 4000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 167mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-56% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 167mm | 241mm |
| Height | 68mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 205.2+120% | 93.3 |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell launched at $849 MSRP and currently averages $748, while the Quadro RTX 4000 launched at $899 and now averages $220. The Quadro RTX 4000 costs 70.6% less ($528 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.2 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs 67.8 (Quadro RTX 4000) — the Quadro RTX 4000 offers 253.1% better value. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2018).
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $849-6% | $899 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $748 | $220-71% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.2 | 67.8+253% |
| Codename | GB206 | TU104 |
| Release | August 11 2025 | November 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #165 | #154 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












