RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell vs Arc B570
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Arc B570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Performance Per Dollar Arc B570
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc B570.
| Insight | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Xe2 (2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (249mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Arc B570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $219 versus $748 for the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell, it costs 71% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 234.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+234.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($748) | ✅More affordable ($219) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell and Arc B570
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 982 MHz to 1957 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,363 points.
Arc B570
The Arc B570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 16 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,060 points. Launch price was $219.
Graphics Performance
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell scores 14,363 and the Arc B570 reaches 14,060 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Arc B570 uses Xe2, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs 2,304 (Arc B570). Raw compute: 17.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs 11.52 TFLOPS (Arc B570). Boost clocks: 1957 MHz vs 2500 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs 18 (Arc B570) with 136 Tensor cores vs 144.
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,363+2% | 14,060 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+89% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.03 TFLOPS+48% | 11.52 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1957 MHz | 2500 MHz+28% |
| ROPs | 64 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 136 | 144+6% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 4.5 MB+5% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+78% | 18 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34+89% | 18 |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 144+6% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Arc B570 has 8 GB. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs 18 MB (Arc B570) — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+60% | 160-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+78% | 18 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc B570). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs Intel Xe Media (Arc B570). Decoder: 6th Gen NVDEC vs Intel Xe Media. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc B570).
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 9th Gen NVENC | Intel Xe Media |
| Decoder | 6th Gen NVDEC | Intel Xe Media |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell draws 70W versus the Arc B570's 150W — a 72.7% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs 600W (Arc B570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 167mm vs 249mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-53% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 167mm | 249mm |
| Height | 68mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 205.2+119% | 93.7 |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell launched at $849 MSRP and currently averages $748, while the Arc B570 launched at $219 and now averages $219. The Arc B570 costs 70.7% less ($529 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.2 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs 64.2 (Arc B570) — the Arc B570 offers 234.4% better value.
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $849 | $219-74% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $748 | $219-71% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.2 | 64.2+234% |
| Codename | GB206 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | August 11 2025 | January 16 2025 |
| Ranking | #165 | #169 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell and Arc B570
