
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell vs Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (16 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo.
| Insight | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 / 5nm) | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | ⚠️ Potential Buffer Bottleneck |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $748 versus $3,500 for the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo, it costs 79% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 379.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+379.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($748) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($3,500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell and Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 982 MHz to 1957 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,363 points.

Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 3 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 475W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,018 points. Launch price was $4,399.
Graphics Performance
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell scores 14,363 and the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo reaches 14,018 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo uses GCN 5.1, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Raw compute: 17.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs 14.09 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Boost clocks: 1957 MHz vs 1720 MHz.
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,363+2% | 14,018 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+6% | 4096 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.03 TFLOPS+21% | 14.09 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 1957 MHz+14% | 1720 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 136 | 256 ×2+88% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+330% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo has 0 MB. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 8.
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 8+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs VCE 4.1 (2x) (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Decoder: 6th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.2 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo).
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 9th Gen NVENC | VCE 4.1 (2x) |
| Decoder | 6th Gen NVDEC | UVD 7.2 (2x) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell draws 70W versus the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo's 475W — a 148.6% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 167mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-85% | 475W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 167mm | 267mm |
| Height | 68mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 2-50% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 205.2+596% | 29.5 |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell launched at $849 MSRP and currently averages $748, while the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo launched at $4399 and now averages $3500. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell costs 78.6% less ($2752 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.2 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell offers 380% better value. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $849-81% | $4399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $748-79% | $3500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.2+380% | 4.0 |
| Codename | GB206 | Vega 20 |
| Release | August 11 2025 | June 3 2019 |
| Ranking | #165 | #170 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















