RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell vs Radeon Pro W5700
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro W5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro W5700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro W5700 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro W5700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 / 5nm) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro W5700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $300 versus $748 for the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell, it costs 60% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 149.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+149.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($748) | ✅More affordable ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell and Radeon Pro W5700
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 982 MHz to 1957 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,363 points.
Radeon Pro W5700
The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell scores 14,363 and the Radeon Pro W5700 reaches 14,380 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro W5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700). Raw compute: 17.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700). Boost clocks: 1957 MHz vs 1930 MHz.
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,363 | 14,380 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+89% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.03 TFLOPS+91% | 8.893 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1957 MHz+1% | 1930 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 136 | 144+6% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5700 has 8 GB. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700) — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Decoder: 6th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700).
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 9th Gen NVENC | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | 6th Gen NVDEC | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell draws 70W versus the Radeon Pro W5700's 205W — a 98.2% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs 500W (Radeon Pro W5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 167mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-66% | 205W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 167mm | 267mm |
| Height | 68mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 205.2+193% | 70.1 |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell launched at $849 MSRP and currently averages $748, while the Radeon Pro W5700 launched at $799 and now averages $300. The Radeon Pro W5700 costs 59.9% less ($448 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.2 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs 47.9 (Radeon Pro W5700) — the Radeon Pro W5700 offers 149.5% better value. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $849 | $799-6% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $748 | $300-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.2 | 47.9+149% |
| Codename | GB206 | Navi 10 |
| Release | August 11 2025 | November 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #165 | #163 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell and Radeon Pro W5700
