Quadro 5000 vs GeForce GTX 1630
Quadro 5000
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1630
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro 5000 is positioned at rank #367 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 5000
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1630
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 1630 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2011). The GeForce GTX 1630 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 5000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1630 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 154.3% higher G3D Mark score and 60% more VRAM (4 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro 5000.
| Insight | Quadro 5000 | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-154.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+154.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+60%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1630 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $90 versus $100 for the Quadro 5000, it costs 10% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 182.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro 5000 | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+182.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($90) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 5000 and GeForce GTX 1630
Quadro 5000
The Quadro 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 23 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 513 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 152W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,963 points. Launch price was $2,499.
GeForce GTX 1630
The GeForce GTX 1630 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,992 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro 5000 scores 1,963 versus the GeForce GTX 1630's 4,992 — the GeForce GTX 1630 leads by 154.3%. The Quadro 5000 is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 1630 uses Turing, both on 40 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 352 (Quadro 5000) vs 512 (GeForce GTX 1630). Raw compute: 0.7223 TFLOPS (Quadro 5000) vs 1.828 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1630).
| Feature | Quadro 5000 | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,963 | 4,992+154% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Turing |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 352 | 512+45% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7223 TFLOPS | 1.828 TFLOPS+153% |
| ROPs | 40+150% | 16 |
| TMUs | 44+38% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB+38% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 1 MB+59% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 5000 | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 5000 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1630 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1630 offers 60% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (Quadro 5000) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1630) — the GeForce GTX 1630 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 5000 | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2.5 GB | 4 GB+60% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 1 MB+59% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 5000 draws 152W versus the GeForce GTX 1630's 75W — a 67.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 1630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 5000) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1630). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro 5000 | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 152W | 75W-51% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 60°C |
| Perf/Watt | 12.9 | 66.6+416% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 5000 launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the GeForce GTX 1630 launched at $150 and now averages $90. The GeForce GTX 1630 costs 10% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.6 (Quadro 5000) vs 55.5 (GeForce GTX 1630) — the GeForce GTX 1630 offers 183.2% better value. The GeForce GTX 1630 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro 5000 | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $150-94% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $90-10% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.6 | 55.5+183% |
| Codename | GF100 | TU117 |
| Release | February 23 2011 | June 28 2022 |
| Ranking | #687 | #444 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 5000 and GeForce GTX 1630
