RTXA5000-24Q vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
RTXA5000-24Q
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RTXA5000-24Q is positioned at rank #331 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTXA5000-24Q
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTXA5000-24Q is significantly newer (2021 vs 0). The RTXA5000-24Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 460 768MB lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTXA5000-24Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
| Insight | RTXA5000-24Q | GeForce GTX 460 768MB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | Fermi (2010−2014) (Standard Node) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTXA5000-24Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTXA5000-24Q and GeForce GTX 460 768MB
RTXA5000-24Q
The RTXA5000-24Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,803 points.
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTXA5000-24Q scores 4,803 and the GeForce GTX 460 768MB reaches 4,800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTXA5000-24Q is built on Ampere while the GeForce GTX 460 768MB uses Fermi. Shader units: 8,192 (RTXA5000-24Q) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 460 768MB).
| Feature | RTXA5000-24Q | GeForce GTX 460 768MB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,803 | 4,800 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Fermi |
| Shading Units | 8192+2338% | 336 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTXA5000-24Q | GeForce GTX 460 768MB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | RTXA5000-24Q | GeForce GTX 460 768MB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The RTXA5000-24Q draws 230W versus the GeForce GTX 460 768MB's 75W — a 101.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RTXA5000-24Q) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460 768MB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | RTXA5000-24Q | GeForce GTX 460 768MB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W | 75W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 210mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 20.9 | 64.0+206% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTXA5000-24Q and GeForce GTX 460 768MB
