
RTXA5000-24Q vs Radeon Pro Vega 16

RTXA5000-24Q
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega 16
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RTXA5000-24Q is positioned at rank #331 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTXA5000-24Q
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTXA5000-24Q offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTXA5000-24Q | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro Vega 16 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTXA5000-24Q and Radeon Pro Vega 16

RTXA5000-24Q
The RTXA5000-24Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,803 points.

Radeon Pro Vega 16
The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,809 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTXA5000-24Q scores 4,803 and the Radeon Pro Vega 16 reaches 4,809 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTXA5000-24Q is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses GCN 5.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 8,192 (RTXA5000-24Q) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Raw compute: 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-24Q) vs 2.437 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 1190 MHz.
| Feature | RTXA5000-24Q | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,803 | 4,809 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 8192+700% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 27.77 TFLOPS+1040% | 2.437 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1695 MHz+42% | 1190 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 256+300% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 8 MB+3100% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+500% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTXA5000-24Q | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTXA5000-24Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 0 MB. The RTXA5000-24Q offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (RTXA5000-24Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 16) — the RTXA5000-24Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTXA5000-24Q | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+500% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RTXA5000-24Q draws 230W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 16's 75W — a 101.6% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RTXA5000-24Q) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | RTXA5000-24Q | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W | 75W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 20.9 | 64.1+207% |
Value Analysis
The RTXA5000-24Q launched at $3721 MSRP and currently averages $2100, while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 costs 100+% less ($2100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.3 (RTXA5000-24Q) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro Vega 16) — the Radeon Pro Vega 16 offers Infinity% better value. The RTXA5000-24Q is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | RTXA5000-24Q | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3721 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2100 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | GA102 | Vega 12 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | November 14 2018 |
| Ranking | #53 | #451 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











