Quadro 5000 vs Quadro 5000
Quadro 5000
Popular choices:
Quadro 5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 5000 is positioned at rank 367 and the Quadro 5000 is on rank 367, so the Quadro 5000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 5000
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 5000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 5000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro 5000.
| Insight | Quadro 5000 | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 5000 and Quadro 5000
Quadro 5000
The Quadro 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 23 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 513 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 152W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,963 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Quadro 5000
The Quadro 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 23 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 513 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 152W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,963 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 5000 scores 1,963 and the Quadro 5000 reaches 1,963 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 5000 is built on Fermi while the Quadro 5000 uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 352 (Quadro 5000) vs 352 (Quadro 5000). Raw compute: 0.7223 TFLOPS (Quadro 5000) vs 0.7223 TFLOPS (Quadro 5000).
| Feature | Quadro 5000 | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,963 | 1,963 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 352 | 352 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7223 TFLOPS | 0.7223 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40 | 40 |
| TMUs | 44 | 44 |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB | 704 KB |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB | 640 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 5000 | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 3 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro 5000 | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2.5 GB | 2.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB | 640 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 5000 draws 152W versus the Quadro 5000's 152W — a 0% difference. The Quadro 5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 5000) vs 350W (Quadro 5000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro 5000 | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 152W | 152W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 12.9 | 12.9 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 5000 launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Quadro 5000 launched at $2499 and now averages $100. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.6 (Quadro 5000) vs 19.6 (Quadro 5000) — the Quadro 5000 offers 0% better value.
| Feature | Quadro 5000 | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.6 | 19.6 |
| Codename | GF100 | GF100 |
| Release | February 23 2011 | February 23 2011 |
| Ranking | #687 | #687 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 5000 and Quadro 5000
