Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 vs Xeon W3680

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 vs Xeon W3680 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

4 / 4

7,106

+1.2%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon W3680

6 / 12

7,025

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 vs Xeon W3680 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 vs Xeon W3680: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

2017

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $484 less on MSRP ($110 MSRP vs $594 MSRP).
✅Delivers 446.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 64.6 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($110 MSRP vs $594 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W3680 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W3680, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.

Xeon W3680

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,025 vs 7,106).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 64.6 PassMark/$ ($594 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 better than Xeon W3680?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W3680 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 comes in $484 cheaper on MSRP at $110 MSRP versus $594 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon W3680 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 11.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 446.2% better value on MSRP (64.6 vs 11.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 vs Xeon W3680 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

The Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 7,106 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon W3680

The Xeon W3680 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,025 points. Launch price was $350.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon W3680 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon W3680 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon W3680 — a 2.8% clock advantage for the Xeon W3680 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W3680 uses Gulftown (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 scores 7,106 against the Xeon W3680's 7,025 — a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W3680.

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 1300	Xeon W3680
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	3.6 GHz+3%
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	3.33 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Zen (2017−2020)	Gulftown (2010−2011)
PassMark	7,106+1%	7,025

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3680 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 1300	Xeon W3680
Socket	AM4	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 was priced at $110, while the Xeon W3680 came in at $594. On launch pricing ($110 vs $594), Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 was $484 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 delivers 64.6 pts/$ vs 11.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W3680 — making the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 the 138.1% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 1300	Xeon W3680
MSRP	$110-81%	$594
Performance per Dollar	64.6+447%	11.8
Release Date	2017	2010

Search Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 on Amazon

Search Xeon W3680 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.