Ryzen 7 8840HS vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 8840HS vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 8840HS vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 8840HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 180W, a 152W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

2018

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (25,148 vs 25,156).
❌Launch MSRP is still $649 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌542.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8840HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 8840HS better than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Ryzen Threadripper 2920X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 8840HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 8840HS is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 8840HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 8840HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 7 8840HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $649 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (38.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 8840HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2018), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of SP3r2, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 12/24. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 7 8840HS vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 8840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,156 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

The Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the ZEN+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 25,148 points. Launch price was $649.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 8840HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8840HS versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X — a 17% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8840HS (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 8840HS uses the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X uses ZEN+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 8840HS scores 25,156 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X's 25,148 — a 0% lead for the Ryzen 7 8840HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8840HS vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.

Feature	Ryzen 7 8840HS	Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+19%	4.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz	3.5 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	32 MB+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	4 nm-67%	12 nm
Architecture	Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)	ZEN+ (2018−2019)
PassMark	25,156	25,148

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 8840HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.