
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700

Xeon E5-4640 v4
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 vs Xeon E5-4640 v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 vs Xeon E5-4640 v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 vs Xeon E5-4640 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,508 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $2,837 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 770.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 69.2 vs 8.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $2,837 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4640 v4, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-4640 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,559 vs 22,777).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 69.2 PassMark/$ ($2,837 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 better than Xeon E5-4640 v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 vs Xeon E5-4640 v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 22,777 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-4640 v4
The Xeon E5-4640 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 22,559 points. Launch price was $2,837.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-4640 v4 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-4640 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 versus 2.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-4640 v4 — a 51.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-4640 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 scores 22,777 against the Xeon E5-4640 v4's 22,559 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 vs 30 MB on the Xeon E5-4640 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 | Xeon E5-4640 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+69% | 2.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+71% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+7% | 30 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 3 MB+500% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 22,777 | 22,559 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-4640 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 | Xeon E5-4640 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4 2133 MHz |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 1.5 TB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 3700) / true (Xeon E5-4640 v4). Primary use case: Xeon E5-4640 v4 targets Server.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 | Xeon E5-4640 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 was priced at $329, while the Xeon E5-4640 v4 came in at $2837. On launch pricing ($329 vs $2837), Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 was $2508 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 delivers 69.2 pts/$ vs 8.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4640 v4 — making the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 the 158.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 | Xeon E5-4640 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-88% | $2837 |
| Performance per Dollar | 69.2+765% | 8.0 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2016 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













