Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 vs Xeon Gold 5415+

Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 vs Xeon Gold 5415+ Performance Spectrum

Ryzen AI Max PRO 380

6 / 12

24,613

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon Gold 5415+

8 / 16

24,842

+0.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 vs Xeon Gold 5415+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 vs Xeon Gold 5415+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 380

2025

Why buy it

✅Draws 55W instead of 150W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5415+ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (24,613 vs 24,842).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 23 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5415+, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5415+ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Gold 5415+

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (23 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌172.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 55W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 5415+ better than Ryzen AI Max PRO 380?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Gold 5415+ makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 5415+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5415+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 40.6% larger total L3 cache (23 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 5415+ is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon Gold 5415+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $400 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 4.7% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 vs Xeon Gold 5415+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 380

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,613 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 5415+

The Xeon Gold 5415+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 22.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,842 points. Launch price was $1,076.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5415+ offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Gold 5415+ has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5415+ — a 17.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 uses the Strix Halo (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5415+ uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 scores 24,613 against the Xeon Gold 5415+'s 24,842 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon Gold 5415+. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 vs 22.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 5415+.

Feature	Ryzen AI Max PRO 380	Xeon Gold 5415+
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+20%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+24%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	22.5 MB+41%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm-60%	10 nm
Architecture	Strix Halo (2025)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	24,613	24,842

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 uses the FP11 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5415+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.