
Ryzen Embedded V1605B

Xeon E5-2623 v3
Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Xeon E5-2623 v3 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Xeon E5-2623 v3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Xeon E5-2623 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
2018Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $294 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $444 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 199.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.8 vs 15.0 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $444 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2623 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 10 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2623 v3, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-2623 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+400% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,652 vs 6,724).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 44.8 PassMark/$ ($444 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Embedded V1605B better than Xeon E5-2623 v3?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Xeon E5-2623 v3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen Embedded V1605B
The Ryzen Embedded V1605B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,724 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2623 v3
The Xeon E5-2623 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 6,652 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Xeon E5-2623 v3 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2623 v3 — a 2.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded V1605B (base: 2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2623 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded V1605B scores 6,724 against the Xeon E5-2623 v3's 6,652 — a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V1605B. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2623 v3.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded V1605B | Xeon E5-2623 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz+3% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3 GHz+50% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 10 MB (total)+400% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 6,724+1% | 6,652 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 899 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 3,683 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2623 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded V1605B | Xeon E5-2623 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP5 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 768 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen Embedded V1605B) / Yes (Xeon E5-2623 v3). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2623 v3 targets Server.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded V1605B | Xeon E5-2623 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen Embedded V1605B was priced at $150, while the Xeon E5-2623 v3 came in at $444. On launch pricing ($150 vs $444), Ryzen Embedded V1605B was $294 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Embedded V1605B delivers 44.8 pts/$ vs 15.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2623 v3 — making the Ryzen Embedded V1605B the 99.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded V1605B | Xeon E5-2623 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-66% | $444 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.8+199% | 15.0 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















