Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Xeon E5-2623 v3

AMD

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2623 v3

4 Cores8 Thrd105 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······

Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Xeon E5-2623 v3 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Xeon E5-2623 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Xeon E5-2623 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

2018

Why buy it

  • +1.1% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $294 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $444 MSRP).
  • Delivers 199.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.8 vs 15.0 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $444 MSRP).
  • Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2623 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 10 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2623 v3, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2623 v3

2014

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +400% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 2 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (6,652 vs 6,724).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 44.8 PassMark/$ ($444 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded V1605B better than Xeon E5-2623 v3?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2623 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen Embedded V1605B is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded V1605B is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen Embedded V1605B is the better buy right now. Ryzen Embedded V1605B comes in $294 cheaper on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $444 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2623 v3 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 199.2% better value on MSRP (44.8 vs 15.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Embedded V1605B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Xeon E5-2623 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

The Ryzen Embedded V1605B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,724 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E5-2623 v3

The Xeon E5-2623 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 6,652 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Xeon E5-2623 v3 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2623 v3 — a 2.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded V1605B (base: 2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2623 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded V1605B scores 6,724 against the Xeon E5-2623 v3's 6,652 — a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V1605B. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2623 v3.

FeatureRyzen Embedded V1605BXeon E5-2623 v3
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz+3%
3.5 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
3 GHz+50%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
10 MB (total)+400%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+100%
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Zen (2017−2020)
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark
6,724+1%
6,652
Geekbench 6 Single
899
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,683
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2623 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen Embedded V1605BXeon E5-2623 v3
Socket
FP5
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-1866
Max RAM Capacity
768 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
40
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen Embedded V1605B) / Yes (Xeon E5-2623 v3). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2623 v3 targets Server.

FeatureRyzen Embedded V1605BXeon E5-2623 v3
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
Target Use
Server
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen Embedded V1605B was priced at $150, while the Xeon E5-2623 v3 came in at $444. On launch pricing ($150 vs $444), Ryzen Embedded V1605B was $294 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Embedded V1605B delivers 44.8 pts/$ vs 15.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2623 v3 — making the Ryzen Embedded V1605B the 99.8% better value option.

FeatureRyzen Embedded V1605BXeon E5-2623 v3
MSRP
$150-66%
$444
Performance per Dollar
44.8+199%
15.0
Release Date
2018
2014

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.