
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6134
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
2017Why buy it
- ✅+29.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,665 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $2,214 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 310.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.7 vs 7.5 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $2,214 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌38.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 130W.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 6134
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 180W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,519 vs 16,829).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.5 vs 30.7 PassMark/$ ($2,214 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
2017Xeon Gold 6134
2017Why buy it
- ✅+29.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,665 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $2,214 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 310.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.7 vs 7.5 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $2,214 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 180W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌38.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 130W.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,519 vs 16,829).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.5 vs 30.7 PassMark/$ ($2,214 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 1900X better than Xeon Gold 6134?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Xeon Gold 6134 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Xeon Gold 6134 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 291 FPS |
| ultra | 280 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 353 FPS | 307 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 253 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 148 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Xeon Gold 6134 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 421 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 399 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 270 FPS | 267 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Xeon Gold 6134 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 421 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 421 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 406 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 351 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon Gold 6134


Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,829 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon Gold 6134
Xeon Gold 6134
The Xeon Gold 6134 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 16,519 points. Launch price was $2,214.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon Gold 6134 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6134 — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6134 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X scores 16,829 against the Xeon Gold 6134's 16,519 — a 1.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6134.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Xeon Gold 6134 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+8% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+19% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+29% | 24.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 8 MB+1500% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 16,829+2% | 16,519 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X uses the SP3r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6134 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Xeon Gold 6134 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3r2 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 768 |
| RAM Channels | — | 6 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 48 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 1900X) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6134).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Xeon Gold 6134 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6134 debuted at $2214. On MSRP ($549 vs $2214), the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is $1665 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X delivers 30.7 pts/$ vs 7.5 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6134 — making the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X the 121.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Xeon Gold 6134 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-75% | $2214 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.7+309% | 7.5 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











