Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs Xeon Gold 6134

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs Xeon Gold 6134 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

8 / 16

16,829

+1.9%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon Gold 6134

8 / 16

16,519

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs Xeon Gold 6134 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs Xeon Gold 6134: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+29.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
✅Costs $1,665 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $2,214 MSRP).
✅Delivers 310.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.7 vs 7.5 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $2,214 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌38.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 130W.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 6134

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 130W instead of 180W, a 50W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (16,519 vs 16,829).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.5 vs 30.7 PassMark/$ ($2,214 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper 1900X better than Xeon Gold 6134?

Yes. Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 15.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 15.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 29.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is the better buy right now. Ryzen Threadripper 1900X comes in $1,665 cheaper on MSRP at $549 MSRP versus $2,214 MSRP, and it still gives you a 15.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 310.8% better value on MSRP (30.7 vs 7.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6134 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs Xeon Gold 6134 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,829 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon Gold 6134

The Xeon Gold 6134 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 16,519 points. Launch price was $2,214.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon Gold 6134 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6134 — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6134 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X scores 16,829 against the Xeon Gold 6134's 16,519 — a 1.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6134.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper 1900X	Xeon Gold 6134
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4 GHz+8%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+19%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB+29%	24.75 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+6300%	8 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Zen (2017−2020)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	16,829+2%	16,519

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X uses the SP3r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6134 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper 1900X	Xeon Gold 6134
Socket	SP3r2	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	2666
Max RAM Capacity	—	768
RAM Channels	—	6
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 1900X) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6134).

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper 1900X	Xeon Gold 6134
Integrated GPU	—	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X was priced at $549, while the Xeon Gold 6134 came in at $2214. On launch pricing ($549 vs $2214), Ryzen Threadripper 1900X was $1665 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X delivers 30.7 pts/$ vs 7.5 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6134 — making the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X the 121.7% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper 1900X	Xeon Gold 6134
MSRP	$549-75%	$2214
Performance per Dollar	30.7+309%	7.5
Release Date	2017	2017

Search Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 6134 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.