Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs Xeon Gold 6134

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

8 Cores16 Thrd180 WWMax: 4 GHz2017

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6134

8 Cores16 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

2017

Why buy it

  • +29.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
  • Costs $1,665 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $2,214 MSRP).
  • Delivers 310.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.7 vs 7.5 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $2,214 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 38.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 130W.
  • No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 6134

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 130W instead of 180W, a 50W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (16,519 vs 16,829).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.5 vs 30.7 PassMark/$ ($2,214 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper 1900X better than Xeon Gold 6134?
Yes. Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 2.6% average FPS lead across 5 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.9% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 2.6% more average FPS across 5 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is the better fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 29.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is $1,665 cheaper on MSRP at $549 MSRP versus $2,214 MSRP, and it gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 5 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 310.8% better value on MSRP (30.7 vs 7.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 6134 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen Threadripper 1900XXeon Gold 6134
1080p
low227 FPS179 FPS
medium198 FPS143 FPS
high163 FPS117 FPS
ultra118 FPS94 FPS
1440p
low183 FPS145 FPS
medium152 FPS113 FPS
high120 FPS91 FPS
ultra87 FPS72 FPS
4K
low71 FPS67 FPS
medium63 FPS56 FPS
high49 FPS44 FPS
ultra39 FPS35 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen Threadripper 1900XXeon Gold 6134
1080p
low421 FPS400 FPS
medium401 FPS346 FPS
high341 FPS291 FPS
ultra280 FPS245 FPS
1440p
low392 FPS346 FPS
medium353 FPS307 FPS
high301 FPS259 FPS
ultra245 FPS216 FPS
4K
low253 FPS225 FPS
medium228 FPS200 FPS
high206 FPS180 FPS
ultra165 FPS148 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen Threadripper 1900XXeon Gold 6134
1080p
low421 FPS413 FPS
medium421 FPS413 FPS
high421 FPS413 FPS
ultra421 FPS413 FPS
1440p
low421 FPS413 FPS
medium421 FPS413 FPS
high421 FPS413 FPS
ultra399 FPS413 FPS
4K
low421 FPS413 FPS
medium362 FPS369 FPS
high324 FPS329 FPS
ultra270 FPS267 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen Threadripper 1900XXeon Gold 6134
1080p
low421 FPS413 FPS
medium421 FPS413 FPS
high421 FPS413 FPS
ultra421 FPS413 FPS
1440p
low421 FPS413 FPS
medium421 FPS413 FPS
high421 FPS413 FPS
ultra421 FPS413 FPS
4K
low421 FPS413 FPS
medium421 FPS413 FPS
high421 FPS406 FPS
ultra371 FPS351 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon Gold 6134

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,829 points. Launch price was $549.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6134

The Xeon Gold 6134 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 16,519 points. Launch price was $2,214.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon Gold 6134 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6134 — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6134 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X scores 16,829 against the Xeon Gold 6134's 16,519 — a 1.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6134.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper 1900XXeon Gold 6134
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4 GHz+8%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+19%
3.2 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB+29%
24.75 MB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
8 MB+1500%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Zen (2017−2020)
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark
16,829+2%
16,519
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X uses the SP3r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6134 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper 1900XXeon Gold 6134
Socket
SP3r2
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
2666
Max RAM Capacity
768
RAM Channels
6
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
48
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 1900X) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6134).

FeatureRyzen Threadripper 1900XXeon Gold 6134
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6134 debuted at $2214. On MSRP ($549 vs $2214), the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is $1665 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X delivers 30.7 pts/$ vs 7.5 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6134 — making the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X the 121.7% better value option.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper 1900XXeon Gold 6134
MSRP
$549-75%
$2214
Performance per Dollar
30.7+309%
7.5
Release Date
2017
2017