
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Xeon W-1390P
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X vs Xeon W-1390P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X vs Xeon W-1390P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X vs Xeon W-1390P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 38.7 vs 42.1 PassMark/$ ($649 MSRP vs $594 MSRP).
- ❌44% higher power demand at 180W vs 125W.
Xeon W-1390P
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $55 less on MSRP ($594 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 8.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 42.1 vs 38.7 PassMark/$ ($594 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 180W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,016 vs 25,148).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 2920X better than Xeon W-1390P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X vs Xeon W-1390P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
The Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the ZEN+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 25,148 points. Launch price was $649.

Xeon W-1390P
The Xeon W-1390P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 25,016 points. Launch price was $539.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 2920X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-1390P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X versus 5.2 GHz on the Xeon W-1390P — a 18.9% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1390P (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 2920X uses the ZEN+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon W-1390P uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X scores 25,148 against the Xeon W-1390P's 25,016 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1390P.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | Xeon W-1390P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 5.2 GHz+21% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | ZEN+ (2018−2019) | Rocket Lake-S (2021) |
| PassMark | 25,148 | 25,016 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 2920X uses the SP3r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1390P uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | Xeon W-1390P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3r2 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X was priced at $649, while the Xeon W-1390P came in at $594. On launch pricing ($649 vs $594), Xeon W-1390P was $55 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X delivers 38.7 pts/$ vs 42.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1390P — making the Xeon W-1390P the 8.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | Xeon W-1390P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | $594-8% |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.7 | 42.1+9% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














