Ryzen Threadripper 3970X vs EPYC 75F3
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
EPYC 75F3
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 75F3
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | EPYC 75F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,491) | ✅ More affordable ($2,799) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Matisse (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm+) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | EPYC 75F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+64%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,491) | ✅ More affordable ($2,799) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 75F3
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 62,946 points. Launch price was $1,999.
EPYC 75F3
The EPYC 75F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.95 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 64,505 points. Launch price was $4,860.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 75F3 share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X versus 4 GHz on the EPYC 75F3 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.95 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the EPYC 75F3 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X scores 62,946 against the EPYC 75F3's 64,505 — a 2.4% lead for the EPYC 75F3. L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 75F3.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | EPYC 75F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+13% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+25% | 2.95 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB | 256 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm+ |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 62,946 | 64,505+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 44,510 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,664 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,739 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 75F3 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X versus 3200 on the EPYC 75F3 — the EPYC 75F3 supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 75F3 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) vs 8 (EPYC 75F3). PCIe lanes: 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) vs 128 (EPYC 75F3) — the EPYC 75F3 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) and SP3 (EPYC 75F3).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | EPYC 75F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 3200+79900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+6553500% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 8+100% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 64 | 128+100% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) vs VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 75F3). Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 3970X rivals Core i9-10980XE; EPYC 75F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | EPYC 75F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X launched at $4491 MSRP, while the EPYC 75F3 debuted at $5383. At current prices ($4491 vs $2799), the EPYC 75F3 is $1692 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X delivers 14.0 pts/$ vs 23.0 pts/$ for the EPYC 75F3 — making the EPYC 75F3 the 48.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | EPYC 75F3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4491-17% | $5383 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $4491 | $2799-38% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.0 | 23.0+64% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 75F3
