Ryzen Threadripper 3970X vs EPYC 9254
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
EPYC 9254
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9254
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | EPYC 9254 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,491) | ✅ More affordable ($1,099) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Matisse (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | EPYC 9254 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+318%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,491) | ✅ More affordable ($1,099) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 9254
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 62,946 points. Launch price was $1,999.
EPYC 9254
The EPYC 9254 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.15 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 64,344 points. Launch price was $2,299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 9254 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X versus 4.15 GHz on the EPYC 9254 — a 8.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the EPYC 9254 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X scores 62,946 against the EPYC 9254's 64,344 — a 2.2% lead for the EPYC 9254. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,664 vs 2,233, a 29.2% lead for the EPYC 9254 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,739 vs 18,023 (27% advantage for the EPYC 9254). L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9254.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | EPYC 9254 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+33% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+8% | 4.15 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+28% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 62,946 | 64,344+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 44,510 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,664 | 2,233+34% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,739 | 18,023+31% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9254 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9254 — the EPYC 9254 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9254 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 184% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) vs 12 (EPYC 9254). PCIe lanes: 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) vs 128 (EPYC 9254) — the EPYC 9254 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) and SP5 (EPYC 9254).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | EPYC 9254 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 6144 GB+2300% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 12+200% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 64 | 128+100% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9254 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) vs AMD-V (EPYC 9254). Primary use case: EPYC 9254 targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 3970X rivals Core i9-10980XE; EPYC 9254 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | EPYC 9254 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Enterprise Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X launched at $4491 MSRP, while the EPYC 9254 debuted at $3761. At current prices ($4491 vs $1099), the EPYC 9254 is $3392 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X delivers 14.0 pts/$ vs 58.5 pts/$ for the EPYC 9254 — making the EPYC 9254 the 122.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | EPYC 9254 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4491 | $3761-16% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $4491 | $1099-76% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.0 | 58.5+318% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 9254
