
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Ryzen 7 3700X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen 7 3700X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 3700X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($368) | ✅ More affordable ($140) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Matisse (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) | ✨ Modern (Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+6%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($368) | ✅ More affordable ($140) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Ryzen 7 3700X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-07-14. It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,261 points. Launch price was $4,499.

Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX scores 62,261 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 94.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+300% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB+300% | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 62,261+178% | 22,430 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 42,986 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,260 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 25,211 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X). PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB+1500% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX rivals Xeon W-3375.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX launched at $1337 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 3700X debuted at $329. At current prices ($368 vs $140), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $228 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX delivers 169.2 pts/$ vs 160.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX the 5.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1337 | $329-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $368 | $140-62% |
| Performance per Dollar | 169.2+6% | 160.2 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















