T400 4GB vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
T400 4GB
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The T400 4GB is positioned at rank #63 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar T400 4GB
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 212.7% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the T400 4GB.
| Insight | T400 4GB | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-212.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+212.7%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $150 (vs $99), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 106.4% better value per dollar than the T400 4GB.
| Insight | T400 4GB | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+106.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($99) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of T400 4GB and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
T400 4GB
The T400 4GB is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the T400 4GB scores 3,803 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 212.7%. The T400 4GB is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 384 (T400 4GB) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 1.094 TFLOPS (T400 4GB) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1425 MHz vs 1755 MHz.
| Feature | T400 4GB | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,803 | 11,892+213% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2560+567% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.094 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+721% |
| Boost Clock | 1425 MHz | 1755 MHz+23% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 80+233% |
| L1 Cache | 0.38 MB | 2.5 MB+558% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | T400 4GB | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The T400 4GB comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (T400 4GB) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | T400 4GB | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (T400 4GB) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | T400 4GB | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12.2+2% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (T400 4GB) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC.
| Feature | T400 4GB | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The T400 4GB draws 30W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 125% difference. The T400 4GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (T400 4GB) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 156mm vs 235mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | T400 4GB | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-77% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 156mm | 235mm |
| Height | — | 124mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 126.8+39% | 91.5 |
Value Analysis
The T400 4GB launched at $159 MSRP and currently averages $99, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The T400 4GB costs 34% less ($51 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 38.4 (T400 4GB) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 106.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | T400 4GB | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159-36% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $99-34% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.4 | 79.3+107% |
| Codename | TU117 | GA106 |
| Release | May 6 2021 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #518 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on T400 4GB and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
