
T400
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7970M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The T400 is positioned at rank 80 and the Radeon HD 7970M is on rank 133, so the T400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar T400
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7970M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The T400 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2012). The T400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 7970M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7970M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the T400.
| Insight | T400 | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 7970M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of T400 and Radeon HD 7970M
T400
The T400 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,609 points.

Radeon HD 7970M
The Radeon HD 7970M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,663 points.
Graphics Performance
The T400 scores 3,609 and the Radeon HD 7970M reaches 3,663 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The T400 is built on Turing while the Radeon HD 7970M uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (T400) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 7970M). Raw compute: 1.094 TFLOPS (T400) vs 2.176 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7970M).
| Feature | T400 | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,609 | 3,663+1% |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1280+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.094 TFLOPS | 2.176 TFLOPS+99% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 80+233% |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+20% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | T400 | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (T400) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 7970M) — the T400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | T400 | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The T400 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 7970M's 100W — a 107.7% difference. The T400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (T400) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7970M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | T400 | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-70% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 120.3+229% | 36.6 |
Value Analysis
The T400 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2012).
| Feature | T400 | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $180 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $179 | — |
| Codename | TU117 | Wimbledon |
| Release | May 6 2021 | April 24 2012 |
| Ranking | #532 | #531 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















