T400
VS
GRID M6-8Q

T400 vs GRID M6-8Q

T400

2021Core: 420 MHzBoost: 1425 MHz
VS

GRID M6-8Q

2015Core: 722 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The T400 is positioned at rank 80 and the GRID M6-8Q is on rank 273, so the T400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar T400

#38
Radeon PRO W6600X
MSRP: $699|Avg: $699
94%
#41
Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
90%
#42
Radeon Pro W5700
MSRP: $799|Avg: $300
90%
#43
Radeon Pro W5700X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
88%
#44
RTX A4000
MSRP: $1111|Avg: $1111
87%
#45
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
MSRP: $849|Avg: $748
84%
#46
Quadro RTX 4000
MSRP: $899|Avg: $220
83%
#65
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
737%
#80
T400
MSRP: $180|Avg: $179
100%
#86
Quadro P3200
MSRP: $500|Avg: $63
86%
#89
Quadro P2000
MSRP: $425|Avg: $190
82%
#90
Quadro T1000
MSRP: $400|Avg: $425
81%
#93
Radeon Pro 580
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
77%
#94
T1000 8GB
MSRP: $500|Avg: $380
77%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M6-8Q

#108
Quadro M6000
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500
99%
#109
Quadro M6000 24GB
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $600
98%
#110
Quadro GV100
MSRP: $8999|Avg: $8999
89%
#258
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
6207%
#273
GRID M6-8Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
100%
#276
GRID K120Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $20
98%
#278
Tesla M60
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $250
98%
#279
FirePro V7900
MSRP: $999|Avg: $120
95%
#280
GRID M60-8A
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
93%
#281
GRID P6-4Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
93%
#283
Quadro K4000
MSRP: $1269|Avg: $100
90%
#285
GRID P4-2Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $235
89%
#287
Tesla C2070
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $38
87%
#288
Quadro 2000 D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $35
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The T400 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2015). The T400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID M6-8Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The T400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M6-8Q.

InsightT400GRID M6-8Q
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GRID M6-8Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $100 versus $179 for the T400, it costs 44% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 77% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightT400GRID M6-8Q
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+77%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($179)
More affordable ($100)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of T400 and GRID M6-8Q

T400

The T400 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,609 points.

NVIDIA

GRID M6-8Q

The GRID M6-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,568 points.

Graphics Performance

The T400 scores 3,609 and the GRID M6-8Q reaches 3,568 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The T400 is built on Turing while the GRID M6-8Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (T400) vs 1,536 (GRID M6-8Q). Raw compute: 1.094 TFLOPS (T400) vs 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID M6-8Q).

FeatureT400GRID M6-8Q
G3D Mark Score
3,609+1%
3,568
Architecture
Turing
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
1536+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.094 TFLOPS
2.218 TFLOPS+103%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
24
96+300%
L1 Cache
384 KB
576 KB+50%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureT400GRID M6-8Q
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The T400 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M6-8Q has 2 GB. The T400 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (T400) vs 2 MB (GRID M6-8Q) — the GRID M6-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureT400GRID M6-8Q
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The T400 draws 30W versus the GRID M6-8Q's 100W — a 107.7% difference. The T400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (T400) vs 350W (GRID M6-8Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureT400GRID M6-8Q
TDP
30W-70%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
120.3+237%
35.7
💰

Value Analysis

The T400 launched at $180 MSRP and currently averages $179, while the GRID M6-8Q launched at $1500 and now averages $100. The GRID M6-8Q costs 44.1% less ($79 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.2 (T400) vs 35.7 (GRID M6-8Q) — the GRID M6-8Q offers 76.7% better value. The T400 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).

FeatureT400GRID M6-8Q
MSRP
$180-88%
$1500
Avg Price (30d)
$179
$100-44%
Performance per Dollar
20.2
35.7+77%
Codename
TU117
GM204
Release
May 6 2021
August 30 2015
Ranking
#532
#535