CPU
GPU
T400
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The T400 is positioned at rank 80 and the GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is on rank 102, so the T400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar T400
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The T400 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2013). The T400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The T400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition.
| Insight | T400 | GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the T400 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of T400 and GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition
T400
The T400 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,609 points.
GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition
The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,569 points.
Graphics Performance
The T400 scores 3,609 and the GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition reaches 3,569 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The T400 is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (T400) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition). Raw compute: 1.094 TFLOPS (T400) vs 2.448 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition). Boost clocks: 1425 MHz vs 797 MHz.
| Feature | T400 | GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,609+1% | 3,569 |
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1536+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.094 TFLOPS | 2.448 TFLOPS+124% |
| Boost Clock | 1425 MHz+79% | 797 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 128+433% |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+200% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | T400 | GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The T400 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition has 2 GB. The T400 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (T400) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) — the T400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | T400 | GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The T400 draws 30W versus the GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition's 122W — a 121.1% difference. The T400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (T400) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | T400 | GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-75% | 122W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 105mm |
| Height | — | 82mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 120.3+311% | 29.3 |
Value Analysis
The T400 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2013).
| Feature | T400 | GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $180 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $179 | — |
| Codename | TU117 | GK104 |
| Release | May 6 2021 | November 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #532 | #625 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on T400 and GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition
