T400 vs Radeon Pro 560X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The T400 is positioned at rank #80 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar T400

#38

Radeon PRO W6600X

MSRP: $699|Avg: $699

94%

#41

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

90%

#42

Radeon Pro W5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $300

90%

#43

Radeon Pro W5700X

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

88%

#44

RTX A4000

MSRP: $1111|Avg: $1111

87%

#45

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

MSRP: $849|Avg: $748

84%

#46

Quadro RTX 4000

MSRP: $899|Avg: $220

83%

#65

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

737%

#80

T400

MSRP: $180|Avg: $179

100%

#86

Quadro P3200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $63

86%

#89

Quadro P2000

MSRP: $425|Avg: $190

82%

#90

Quadro T1000

MSRP: $400|Avg: $425

81%

#93

Radeon Pro 580

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

77%

#94

T1000 8GB

MSRP: $500|Avg: $380

77%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro 560X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the T400 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	T400	Radeon Pro 560X
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro 560X remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

T400 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro 560X Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of T400 and Radeon Pro 560X

T400

The T400 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,609 points.

Radeon Pro 560X

The Radeon Pro 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1004 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The T400 scores 3,609 and the Radeon Pro 560X reaches 3,678 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The T400 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro 560X uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (T400) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560X). Raw compute: 1.094 TFLOPS (T400) vs 2.056 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 560X).

Feature	T400	Radeon Pro 560X
G3D Mark Score	3,609	3,678+2%
Architecture	Turing	GCN 4.0
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	1024+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.094 TFLOPS	2.056 TFLOPS+88%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	24	64+167%
L1 Cache	384 KB+50%	256 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	T400	Radeon Pro 560X
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The T400 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 560X has 2 GB. The T400 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	T400	Radeon Pro 560X
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The T400 draws 30W versus the Radeon Pro 560X's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The T400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (T400) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 560X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	T400	Radeon Pro 560X
TDP	30W-60%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	120.3+146%	49.0

💰

Value Analysis

The T400 launched at $180 MSRP and currently averages $179, while the Radeon Pro 560X launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon Pro 560X costs 100+% less ($179 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.2 (T400) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 560X) — the Radeon Pro 560X offers Infinity% better value. The T400 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).