
T400
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 4100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The T400 is positioned at rank 80 and the Radeon Pro WX 4100 is on rank 148, so the T400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar T400
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 4100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The T400 uses modern memory architecture. The T400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the T400.
| Insight | T400 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $85 versus $179 for the T400, it costs 53% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 114.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | T400 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+114.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($179) | ✅More affordable ($85) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of T400 and Radeon Pro WX 4100
T400
The T400 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,609 points.

Radeon Pro WX 4100
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The T400 scores 3,609 and the Radeon Pro WX 4100 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The T400 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (T400) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Raw compute: 1.094 TFLOPS (T400) vs 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Boost clocks: 1425 MHz vs 1201 MHz.
| Feature | T400 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,609 | 3,682+2% |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1024+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.094 TFLOPS | 2.46 TFLOPS+125% |
| Boost Clock | 1425 MHz+19% | 1201 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 64+167% |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | T400 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | T400 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The T400 draws 30W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4100's 50W — a 50% difference. The T400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (T400) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | T400 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 120.3+63% | 73.6 |
Value Analysis
The T400 launched at $180 MSRP and currently averages $179, while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 launched at $399 and now averages $85. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 costs 52.5% less ($94 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.2 (T400) vs 43.3 (Radeon Pro WX 4100) — the Radeon Pro WX 4100 offers 114.4% better value. The T400 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | T400 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $180-55% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $179 | $85-53% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.2 | 43.3+114% |
| Codename | TU117 | Baffin |
| Release | May 6 2021 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #532 | #526 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















