Tesla C2075 vs FirePro W5000

Tesla C2075

2011Core: 574 MHz

FirePro W5000

2012Core: 825 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Tesla C2075

247

3,017

+1.7%

GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

FirePro W5000

2,967

0.0%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W5000

#92

RTX A6000

MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500

99%

#93

Quadro RTX A6000

MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500

99%

#94

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799

89%

#201

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2984%

#216

FirePro W5000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

100%

#219

FirePro W7000 Adapter

MSRP: $899|Avg: $15

99%

#220

Quadro K420

MSRP: $150|Avg: $20

98%

#223

FirePro W7000

MSRP: $899|Avg: $50

97%

#224

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

MSRP: $169|Avg: $100

96%

#226

FirePro D500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

92%

#227

FirePro 3D V4800

MSRP: $189|Avg: $20

91%

#231

GRID T4-2Q

MSRP: $845|Avg: $600

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Tesla C2075 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro W5000.

Insight	Tesla C2075	FirePro W5000
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro W5000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W5000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $500), it costs 92% less, resulting in a 1129.3% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Tesla C2075	FirePro W5000
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+1129.3%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)	✅More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Tesla C2075 Benchmark Check

FirePro W5000 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Tesla C2075 and FirePro W5000

Tesla C2075

The Tesla C2075 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 247W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,017 points.

FirePro W5000

The FirePro W5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,967 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Tesla C2075 scores 3,017 and the FirePro W5000 reaches 2,967 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla C2075 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the FirePro W5000 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (Tesla C2075) vs 768 (FirePro W5000). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2075) vs 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro W5000).

Feature	Tesla C2075	FirePro W5000
G3D Mark Score	3,017+2%	2,967
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	448	768+71%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.028 TFLOPS	1.267 TFLOPS+23%
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	56+17%	48
L1 Cache	896 KB+367%	192 KB
L2 Cache	768 KB+50%	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Tesla C2075	FirePro W5000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Tesla C2075) vs 512 KB (FirePro W5000) — the Tesla C2075 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Tesla C2075	FirePro W5000
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	768 KB+50%	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2075) vs 12 (FirePro W5000). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 6.

Feature	Tesla C2075	FirePro W5000
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	1	6+500%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Tesla C2075) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro W5000).

Feature	Tesla C2075	FirePro W5000
Encoder	—	VCE 1.0
Decoder	—	UVD 4.0
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Tesla C2075 draws 247W versus the FirePro W5000's 75W — a 106.8% difference. The FirePro W5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla C2075) vs 350W (FirePro W5000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Tesla C2075	FirePro W5000
TDP	247W	75W-70%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	183mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	85°C	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	12.2	39.6+225%

💰

Value Analysis

The Tesla C2075 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the FirePro W5000 launched at $599 and now averages $40. The FirePro W5000 costs 92% less ($460 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.0 (Tesla C2075) vs 74.2 (FirePro W5000) — the FirePro W5000 offers 1136.7% better value. The FirePro W5000 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2011).