Tesla C2075 vs GeForce GTX 860M
Tesla C2075
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 860M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 860M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 860M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla C2075.
| Insight | Tesla C2075 | GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 860M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 860M holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $500), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 925.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla C2075 | GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+925.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla C2075 and GeForce GTX 860M
Tesla C2075
The Tesla C2075 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 247W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,017 points.
GeForce GTX 860M
The GeForce GTX 860M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 13 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1152 or 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,095 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla C2075 scores 3,017 and the GeForce GTX 860M reaches 3,095 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla C2075 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 860M uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (Tesla C2075) vs 1,152 (GeForce GTX 860M). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2075) vs 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 860M).
| Feature | Tesla C2075 | GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,017 | 3,095+3% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 448 | 1152 or 640+157% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.028 TFLOPS | 1.389 TFLOPS+35% |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 56+40% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+180% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla C2075 | GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Tesla C2075) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 860M) — the GeForce GTX 860M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla C2075 | GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2075) vs 11.0 (GeForce GTX 860M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 1.
| Feature | Tesla C2075 | GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+9% | 11.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Tesla C2075) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 (GeForce GTX 860M).
| Feature | Tesla C2075 | GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | NVENC 2.0 |
| Decoder | — | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla C2075 draws 247W versus the GeForce GTX 860M's 75W — a 106.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 860M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla C2075) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 860M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Tesla C2075 | GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 247W | 75W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 12.2 | 41.3+239% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 860M costs 90% less ($450 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.0 (Tesla C2075) vs 61.9 (GeForce GTX 860M) — the GeForce GTX 860M offers 931.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 860M is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | Tesla C2075 | GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $50-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.0 | 61.9+932% |
| Codename | GF110 | GM107 |
| Release | July 25 2011 | January 13 2014 |
| Ranking | #553 | #578 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla C2075 and GeForce GTX 860M
