Tesla C2075
VS
Radeon HD 7790

Tesla C2075 vs Radeon HD 7790

NVIDIA

Tesla C2075

2011Core: 574 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7790

2013Core: 1000 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 7790 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla C2075.

InsightTesla C2075Radeon HD 7790
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%)
Leading raw performance (+2.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 7790 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7790 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $500), it costs 92% less, resulting in a 1180.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightTesla C2075Radeon HD 7790
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1180.2%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)
More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Tesla C2075 and Radeon HD 7790

NVIDIA

Tesla C2075

The Tesla C2075 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 247W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,017 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 7790

The Radeon HD 7790 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 22 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,090 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

The Tesla C2075 scores 3,017 and the Radeon HD 7790 reaches 3,090 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla C2075 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon HD 7790 uses GCN 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (Tesla C2075) vs 896 (Radeon HD 7790). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2075) vs 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7790).

FeatureTesla C2075Radeon HD 7790
G3D Mark Score
3,017
3,090+2%
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
GCN 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
448
896+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.028 TFLOPS
1.792 TFLOPS+74%
ROPs
48+200%
16
TMUs
56
56
L1 Cache
896 KB+300%
224 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureTesla C2075Radeon HD 7790
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Tesla C2075) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 7790) — the Tesla C2075 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureTesla C2075Radeon HD 7790
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2075) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon HD 7790). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 5.

FeatureTesla C2075Radeon HD 7790
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
1
5+400%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Tesla C2075) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 7790).

FeatureTesla C2075Radeon HD 7790
Encoder
VCE 2.0
Decoder
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Tesla C2075 draws 247W versus the Radeon HD 7790's 85W — a 97.6% difference. The Radeon HD 7790 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla C2075) vs 400W (Radeon HD 7790). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70.

FeatureTesla C2075Radeon HD 7790
TDP
247W
85W-66%
Recommended PSU
350W-13%
400W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
183mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
70-18%
Perf/Watt
12.2
36.4+198%
💰

Value Analysis

The Tesla C2075 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Radeon HD 7790 launched at $149 and now averages $40. The Radeon HD 7790 costs 92% less ($460 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.0 (Tesla C2075) vs 77.3 (Radeon HD 7790) — the Radeon HD 7790 offers 1188.3% better value. The Radeon HD 7790 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).

FeatureTesla C2075Radeon HD 7790
MSRP
$0-100%
$149
Avg Price (30d)
$500
$40-92%
Performance per Dollar
6.0
77.3+1188%
Codename
GF110
Bonaire
Release
July 25 2011
March 22 2013
Ranking
#553
#579