Tesla C2075 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
Popular choices:
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is significantly newer (2024 vs 2011). The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla C2075 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla C2075 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS.
| Insight | Tesla C2075 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | Legacy (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Tesla C2075 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla C2075 and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
The Tesla C2075 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 247W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,017 points.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in September 3 2024. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla C2075 scores 3,017 and the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS reaches 3,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 448 (Tesla C2075) vs 768 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS).
| Feature | Tesla C2075 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,017 | 3,000 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 448 | 768+71% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla C2075 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tesla C2075 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS has 0 MB. The Tesla C2075 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Tesla C2075 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2075) vs 12 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS). OpenGL: 4.6 vs ES 3.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.
| Feature | Tesla C2075 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+44% | ES 3.2 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 3+200% |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Tesla C2075) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS).
| Feature | Tesla C2075 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | Adreno VPU |
| Decoder | — | Adreno VPU |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla C2075 draws 247W versus the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS's 20W — a 170% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla C2075) vs 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.
| Feature | Tesla C2075 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 247W | 20W-92% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 12.2 | 150.0+1130% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla C2075 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS costs 100+% less ($500 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.0 (Tesla C2075) vs Infinity (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) — the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS offers Infinity% better value. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2011).
| Feature | Tesla C2075 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | GF110 | — |
| Release | July 25 2011 | September 3 2024 |
| Ranking | #553 | #636 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla C2075 and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
