Tesla C2075
VS
Tesla C2070

Tesla C2075 vs Tesla C2070

NVIDIA

Tesla C2075

2011Core: 574 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla C2070

2011Core: 574 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Tesla C2075
247
3,017
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 480M
brand logoGeForce GTX 460 v2
brand logoGeForce MX330
brand logoGeForce GTX 465
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
brand logoRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Tesla C2070
238
3,121
+3.4%
brand logoGeForce GT 755M
brand logoGeForce GTX 670MX SLI
brand logoGeForce GT 1030
brand logoGeForce GTX 560
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
brand logoRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Tesla C2070

#111
Tesla P40
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $150
100%
#112
GRID RTX6000-1Q
MSRP: $6299|Avg: $1500
96%
#113
Quadro RTX 8000
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9999
96%
#114
Quadro GP100
MSRP: $7000|Avg: $1335
94%
#115
Radeon Instinct MI60
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $600
93%
#272
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
7102%
#287
Tesla C2070
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $38
100%
#288
Quadro 2000 D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $35
100%
#290
FirePro V5900
MSRP: $599|Avg: $15
99%
#291
FirePro S9000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $156
97%
#294
GRID P40-4Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
95%
#295
RTXA5000-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500
95%
#296
GRID P6-2Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
94%
#299
GRID K220Q
MSRP: $469|Avg: $40
93%
#300
FirePro W9100
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $200
93%
#302
GRID T4-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1000
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Tesla C2070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.4% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (6 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla C2075.

InsightTesla C2075Tesla C2070
Performance
❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.4%)
✅Leading raw performance (+3.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+200%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
—
Standard Size (248mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Tesla C2070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Tesla C2070 holds the technical lead. Priced at $38 (vs $500), it costs 92% less, resulting in a 1261.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightTesla C2075Tesla C2070
Cost Efficiency
❌Lower cost efficiency
✅Better overall value (+1261.1%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)
✅More affordable ($38)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Tesla C2075 Benchmark Check

Tesla C2070 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low136 FPS
medium101 FPS
high78 FPS
ultra59 FPS
1440p
low98 FPS
medium73 FPS
high57 FPS
ultra41 FPS
4K
low35 FPS
medium28 FPS
high23 FPS
ultra15 FPS
Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low140 FPS
medium102 FPS
high79 FPS
ultra68 FPS
1440p
low105 FPS
medium84 FPS
high68 FPS
ultra53 FPS
4K
low42 FPS
medium33 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra19 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low136 FPS
medium108 FPS
high84 FPS
ultra62 FPS
1440p
low100 FPS
medium80 FPS
high57 FPS
ultra40 FPS
4K
low50 FPS
medium39 FPS
high29 FPS
ultra23 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low137 FPS
medium108 FPS
high85 FPS
ultra65 FPS
1440p
low99 FPS
medium81 FPS
high58 FPS
ultra43 FPS
4K
low52 FPS
medium42 FPS
high32 FPS
ultra25 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low136 FPS
medium109 FPS
high91 FPS
ultra68 FPS
1440p
low102 FPS
medium81 FPS
high68 FPS
ultra51 FPS
4K
low68 FPS
medium54 FPS
high45 FPS
ultra34 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low140 FPS
medium112 FPS
high94 FPS
ultra70 FPS
1440p
low105 FPS
medium84 FPS
high70 FPS
ultra53 FPS
4K
low70 FPS
medium56 FPS
high47 FPS
ultra35 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low136 FPS
medium109 FPS
high91 FPS
ultra67 FPS
1440p
low99 FPS
medium81 FPS
high66 FPS
ultra38 FPS
4K
low42 FPS
medium35 FPS
high21 FPS
ultra13 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low140 FPS
medium112 FPS
high94 FPS
ultra70 FPS
1440p
low105 FPS
medium84 FPS
high70 FPS
ultra53 FPS
4K
low70 FPS
medium56 FPS
high47 FPS
ultra35 FPS
Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Tesla C2075 and Tesla C2070

NVIDIA

Tesla C2075

The Tesla C2075 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 247W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,017 points.

NVIDIA

Tesla C2070

The Tesla C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,121 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Tesla C2075 scores 3,017 and the Tesla C2070 reaches 3,121 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla C2075 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Tesla C2070 uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 448 (Tesla C2075) vs 448 (Tesla C2070). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2075) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2070).

FeatureTesla C2075Tesla C2070
G3D Mark Score
3,017
3,121+3%
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Fermi
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
448
448
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.028 TFLOPS
1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs
48
48
TMUs
56
56
L1 Cache
896 KB
896 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
768 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureTesla C2075Tesla C2070
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Tesla C2075 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2070 has 6 GB. The Tesla C2070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureTesla C2075Tesla C2070
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
6 GB+200%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
768 KB
768 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2075) vs 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2070). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 1.

FeatureTesla C2075Tesla C2070
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
1
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Tesla C2075) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Tesla C2070).

FeatureTesla C2075Tesla C2070
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Tesla C2075 draws 247W versus the Tesla C2070's 238W — a 3.7% difference. The Tesla C2070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla C2075) vs 350W (Tesla C2070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureTesla C2075Tesla C2070
TDP
247W
238W-4%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
—
248mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
—
Perf/Watt
12.2
13.1+7%
💰

Value Analysis

The Tesla C2075 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Tesla C2070 launched at $1499 and now averages $38. The Tesla C2070 costs 92.4% less ($462 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.0 (Tesla C2075) vs 82.1 (Tesla C2070) — the Tesla C2070 offers 1268.3% better value.

FeatureTesla C2075Tesla C2070
MSRP
$0-100%
$1499
Avg Price (30d)
$500
$38-92%
Performance per Dollar
6.0
82.1+1268%
Codename
GF110
GF100
Release
July 25 2011
July 25 2011
Ranking
#553
#575