Tesla K40c vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Tesla K40c
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tesla K40c is positioned at rank #378 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K40c
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is significantly newer (2022 vs 2013). The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla K40c lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 164.6% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla K40c.
| Insight | Tesla K40c | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-164.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+164.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $500 for the Tesla K40c, it costs 70% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 781.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla K40c | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+781.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla K40c and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Tesla K40c
The Tesla K40c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $7,699.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Tesla K40c scores 4,495 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 164.6%. The Tesla K40c is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (Tesla K40c) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 5.046 TFLOPS (Tesla K40c) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 1755 MHz.
| Feature | Tesla K40c | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,495 | 11,892+165% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880+13% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.046 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+78% |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 1755 MHz+100% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240+200% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 0.23 MB | 2.5 MB+987% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla K40c | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tesla K40c comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Tesla K40c) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla K40c | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (Tesla K40c) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Tesla K40c | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0 | 12.2+11% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla K40c draws 245W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 61.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla K40c) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 235mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Tesla K40c | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 245W | 130W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 235mm |
| Height | — | 124mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 18.3 | 91.5+400% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla K40c launched at $7699 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 70% less ($350 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.0 (Tesla K40c) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 781.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | Tesla K40c | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7699 | $249-97% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $150-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.0 | 79.3+781% |
| Codename | GK180 | GA106 |
| Release | October 8 2013 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #465 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla K40c and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
