
Titan X Pascal vs Radeon RX 5600 XT

Titan X Pascal
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5600 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5600 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 5600 XT uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 5600 XT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Titan X Pascal lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Titan X Pascal is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 5600 XT.
| Insight | Titan X Pascal | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 5600 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $180 versus $200 for the Titan X Pascal, it costs 10% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 9.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Titan X Pascal | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+9.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($180) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Titan X Pascal and Radeon RX 5600 XT

Titan X Pascal
The Titan X Pascal is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 2 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1417 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,660 points. Launch price was $1,199.

Radeon RX 5600 XT
The Radeon RX 5600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,453 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The Titan X Pascal scores 13,660 and the Radeon RX 5600 XT reaches 13,453 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Titan X Pascal is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 5600 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Titan X Pascal) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Raw compute: 10.97 TFLOPS (Titan X Pascal) vs 7.188 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Boost clocks: 1531 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,660+2% | 13,453 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+56% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.97 TFLOPS+53% | 7.188 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | 1560 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 224+56% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Titan X Pascal comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5600 XT has 6 GB. The Titan X Pascal offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 480 GB/s (Titan X Pascal) vs 336 GB/s (Radeon RX 5600 XT) — a 42.9% advantage for the Titan X Pascal. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 480 GB/s+43% | 336 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Titan X Pascal) vs 12 (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Titan X Pascal) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Titan X Pascal) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600 XT).
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 (2x) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Titan X Pascal draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 5600 XT's 150W — a 50% difference. The Radeon RX 5600 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Titan X Pascal) vs 450W (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 150W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 450W-25% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 54.6 | 89.7+64% |
Value Analysis
The Titan X Pascal launched at $1199 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Radeon RX 5600 XT launched at $279 and now averages $180. The Radeon RX 5600 XT costs 10% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 68.3 (Titan X Pascal) vs 74.7 (Radeon RX 5600 XT) — the Radeon RX 5600 XT offers 9.4% better value. The Radeon RX 5600 XT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1199 | $279-77% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $180-10% |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.3 | 74.7+9% |
| Codename | GP102 | Navi 10 |
| Release | August 2 2016 | January 21 2020 |
| Ranking | #198 | #187 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















